How to Choose Digital Product Design Company in Canada
Great ideas rarely fail because of ambition. They fail because the product feels confusing, clunky, or forgettable the moment real users touch it. For Canadian founders, that reality hits fast. Whether you are building a startup in Toronto, scaling a SaaS company in Vancouver, or launching an ecommerce brand in Calgary, design is no longer just about making things look good. It shapes trust, conversion, retention, and growth.
Choosing a digital product design agency can feel overwhelming. Every agency promises strategy, UX expertise, sleek visuals, and results. Yet the right partner should do more than deliver screens. They should understand your customers, challenge weak assumptions, and turn rough ideas into products people actually enjoy using.
The guide shows Canadian founders how to evaluate agencies in 2026 while preventing costly errors and finding design partners who will create instant progress for their work.
TL;DR
- Choosing the right digital product design agency affects product adoption, growth, and long term success.
- Canadian founders should evaluate agencies on process, strategy, compliance knowledge, and delivery quality.
- Strong agencies focus on discovery, usability, accessibility, and developer ready handoff.
- The best partner is the one that fits your stage, budget, and product complexity.
Key Points
- A digital product design agency does more than create visuals. It connects business goals, user needs, product strategy, UX, UI, and development execution.
- Discovery is one of the most valuable phases because it validates user problems, market demand, priorities, and product direction before expensive build work begins.
- Good agencies rely on research, wireframing, prototyping, usability testing, and iteration instead of making decisions based on assumptions.
- A mature design system improves consistency, speeds up development, and reduces long term product chaos as the platform grows.
- Developer handoff should include organized files, documented states, component rules, and ongoing collaboration during implementation.
- Canadian businesses should assess whether an agency understands privacy regulations, accessibility standards, and bilingual user experience needs.
- Agencies, freelancers, and in house teams each serve different needs. Agencies suit complex builds, freelancers fill skill gaps, and in house teams support continuous product growth.
- Common pricing models include fixed scope projects, monthly retainers, and embedded team arrangements, each with different tradeoffs.
- Red flags include weak discovery processes, vague contracts, no measurable case studies, poor handoff practices, and limited accessibility awareness.
- The best agency relationships continue after launch through analytics reviews, user feedback, and iterative product improvements.
What a Digital Product Design Agency Actually Does
The short version: they translate your business goals into digital experiences that users actually adopt. That’s broader than it sounds.
A UI/UX agency focuses on interface design and user flow. A dev shop focuses on building. A digital product design agency sits at the intersection of strategy, design, and technology, and the best ones don’t hand off to someone else when the work gets complex. They own the problem from “what are we building and why” through “here’s a dev-ready system your engineers can actually ship.”
Most buyers grant less importance to that distinction than it actually deserves. A team that just produces beautiful screens and then disappears has fundamentally different accountability than a team that stays involved through development and cares whether the shipped product matches the design intent. Any developer who received a Figma file containing 200 artboards without a component library and without edge case documentation will tell you the same thing. The team required to make numerous assumptions about unknown elements.
The best digital product design agencies operate end-to-end. They run research to validate that you’re solving a real problem, design an experience that reflects how users actually think about that problem, build a design system that makes development faster and more consistent, and stay close enough through the build phase to catch drift before it becomes rework.
Also Read: Importance of User-Centered Design in App Development
Core Services You Should Expect (and What to Ask About Each)
Not every agency offers all of these. But you should know what each one involves so you can ask the right questions during evaluation, and so you don’t pay for services you don’t actually need right now.
Strategic Product Discovery: This is where good agencies earn their fees. Before any design work starts, a real discovery phase includes market analysis, competitive research, stakeholder interviews, and user persona validation. It answers whether the product has a reason to exist, not just whether it can be built technically. Ask any agency you are evaluating what their last discovery phase changed about project direction.
UX Research: UX research goes beyond assumptions. User interviews, behavioral analytics, journey mapping, and usability testing help agencies uncover real pain points instead of designing for imagined ones. Shallow research often leads to products that look polished but confuse real users. Ask to see a past research report, not only final designs.
UI Design: The product’s visual appearance consists of UI design which encompasses color systems and typography and iconography and spacing and component design and micro interactions. Most people associate design with this particular thing. Its importance exists because it holds weight but it cannot function as a standalone solution.
Prototyping and Wireframing: This process tests ideas through pressure assessments before engineering teams begin their work. Interactive prototypes help organizations discover operational shortcomings and user experience problems at a reduced expense compared to discovering them during production. An agency that wants to move straight to advanced design work without conducting tests first represents a potential danger signal.
Design Systems and Component Libraries: These systems enable products to expand their operational capacity while maintaining visual cohesion. A design system establishes a set of components that developers can reuse along with design states and design tokens and design documentation which prevents new button designs and pattern creation for every page development process. The value of this element gets ignored in proposals while it gets delivered in an insufficient manner during actual work.
Development Handoff: This is where many agency relationships break down. A proper handoff is more than exporting screens. It should include dev ready Figma files, documented states and edge cases, token values, interaction notes, and ongoing support for developer questions during the build phase. If the process is unclear, it likely does not exist.
Accessibility Design: Accessibility is non negotiable for Canadian markets. Ontario’s AODA requires digital products to meet WCAG 2.1 AA standards, while federal contracts often require WCAG 2.2. Ask whether the agency actively designs and tests for accessibility or assumes someone else will handle it later.
AI Integration Design: This is becoming increasingly important. AI powered features such as personalization, intelligent search, predictive inputs, and chatbot flows require design patterns many traditional agencies have not mastered. If AI is part of your roadmap, confirm the agency has delivered these features before.
Post Launch Iteration Support: This separates agencies focused on outcomes from those focused only on deliverables. Strong partnerships continue after launch with observation periods, user feedback reviews, and design improvements based on real usage. Ask what their post launch support includes and whether it is billed separately.
Data and Analytics Design: This means creating products that generate useful signals you can act on. Instrumentation should be built into the product architecture from the beginning, not added later. This is especially valuable for SaaS products where growth depends on knowing where users succeed and where they drop off.
The 2026 Design Landscape: What Actually Matters for Canadian Businesses
The trends that matter aren’t the aesthetic ones. Every agency will tell you about dark mode and micro-interactions. Here’s what actually affects the products Canadian businesses are building right now.
AI Native Workflows: AI native workflows are the new baseline. Agencies that have not integrated AI into research synthesis, design generation, and accessibility testing are already slower and more expensive than those that have. The real question is not whether an agency uses AI tools, but whether they use them to improve client outcomes instead of only speeding up deliverables.
Minimalism as Performance: Minimalism is no longer just a style choice. It is a performance choice. Simpler interfaces load faster, perform better with accessibility tools, and reduce support ticket volume because users can understand what to do more easily. If an agency portfolio looks like an award showcase instead of a product people use, ask about usability testing results.
PIPEDA Compliant UX Design: PIPEDA compliant UX design is something many global agencies overlook because they are unfamiliar with Canadian privacy law. If your product collects personal information from Canadians, consent flows, data collection notices, and privacy settings are not only legal matters. They are trust design decisions that affect conversion and retention. You want a partner who already understands this.
Bilingual UX Design: Bilingual UX matters more than many founders expect until they begin selling nationally. Designing for both English and French is not just translation. It also affects layout, navigation, and accessibility, since French text is often 20 to 30 percent longer than English. Federally regulated companies and government contractors often require this capability.
AODA and WCAG Compliance: AODA and WCAG 2.2 compliance is no longer optional for Ontario businesses or companies pursuing federal contracts. Strong agencies build accessibility into the design phase from the start. Weak agencies treat it as something to fix later with quick adjustments.
Voice First Interfaces: Voice first and hands free interfaces are now mainstream in healthcare, automotive, and smart home sectors. If your product will be used in hands busy environments, your design partner should have real experience with voice UX patterns rather than only theoretical knowledge.
Sustainability Conscious Design: Sustainability conscious design is becoming a real priority for Canadian tech companies with ESG goals or government clients. This includes optimizing workflows to reduce compute load, choosing efficient media formats, and building modular features that can be updated without full rebuilds.
Extended Reality Design: Extended Reality design patterns are becoming practical rather than experimental, especially in retail, real estate, and industrial training. Alberta’s oil and gas sector, for example, is actively exploring XR for field training and remote operations support.
Agency vs. Freelancer vs. In-House: Which Model Fits Your Stage?
This is the question most buyers don’t ask clearly enough before they start evaluating agencies. The right model depends on your stage, your product complexity, and your internal capacity, not on which option has the best-looking website.
Here’s the comparison:
| Factor | Digital Product Design Agency | Freelancer(s) | In-House Designer |
| Cost (CAD) | $40,000 to $250,000+ per project | $75 to $200/hour | $70,000 to $130,000+/year salary |
| Speed to Start | 2 to 4 weeks onboarding | 1 to 2 weeks | 4 to 12 weeks hiring |
| Depth of Capability | Full-stack: strategy, UX, UI, systems, dev handoff | Specialist only (usually) | Single person; limited scope |
| Scalability | Can scale the team to the project | Hard to scale quickly | Limited by headcount |
| Risk | Higher per-project cost; accountability via contract | Higher coordination overhead | Highest retention risk |
| Best For | Complex products, funded startups, enterprise builds | Targeted gaps in the existing team | Mature products with ongoing iteration needs |
| Canadian Regulatory Awareness | Varies; ask explicitly | Varies; mostly unaware | Depends on hiring |
The real take: agencies are worth it when you’re building something complex from scratch, when your internal design capacity is limited, or when you need a validated process that reduces the chance of shipping something your users won’t adopt. Freelancers make sense for filling specific gaps in an existing team. In-house makes sense when your product is mature and needs continuous iteration more than a major build.
Engagement Models: How Agencies Charge and Which Works for You
Pricing structures matter as much as pricing levels. Picking the wrong engagement model creates friction, scope disputes, and unexpected invoices.
Fixed Price Projects: Fixed price projects work well for clearly scoped MVPs or specific design phases such as discovery, UI design, or a feature build. You know what you are getting and what it will cost. The tradeoff is that agencies often add buffer pricing for uncertainty, which can make this model more expensive than time based billing when scope is clear.
Monthly Retainers: Monthly retainers suit products in active development or post launch iteration. You pay for a set number of hours or design capacity each month. This works best when your needs are ongoing and predictable. It is less efficient when one month requires heavy support and the next needs very little.
Embedded Squad Model: The embedded squad model is when an agency team effectively joins your internal product team, works inside your Slack, attends standups, and follows your sprint cadence. It is usually the most expensive monthly option, but often the most effective for complex B2B SaaS products where design decisions happen continuously. For teams in the same time zone, this can work especially well.
Equity or Success Based Engagements: Equity or success based engagements are rare and usually aimed at early stage startups with clear traction potential. The agency accepts a smaller upfront fee in exchange for equity or a share of future revenue. While the incentive alignment can sound appealing, conflicts around valuation, ownership, and exit terms are common.
Most Canadian founders starting a new product are best served by a fixed-price discovery phase first ($10,000 to $25,000 CAD typically), followed by a clear proposal for the full design engagement. That structure lets you evaluate the agency’s thinking before committing to the bigger number.
How to Choose the Right Digital Product Design Agency
Portfolios are table stakes. Every agency has one. Here’s what separates the due diligence that matters from the process that just makes you feel like you’ve done it.
Look for Case Studies: Look for case studies, not just screens. A case study shows the problem, the process, and measurable outcomes. A portfolio only shows finished visuals. Any agency can make screens look good, but strong agencies can show before and after improvements in metrics such as onboarding completion, churn reduction, or task completion rates.
Ask About Discovery Process: Ask specifically how they begin a project, how long discovery lasts, and what it produces. If the answer is vague, the process is likely vague too. Weak discovery often leads to deliverables that do not align with business goals.
Evaluate Design System Maturity: Ask to see a real design system they have shipped, not only a style guide. A mature system includes component variants, documented states, interaction specifications, and token structures. If they do not understand design tokens, that is a warning sign.
Test Development Handoff: Ask what developers receive at the end of the design phase. Also ask whether engineers have ever complained about handoff files. The response to that second question can reveal more than any polished portfolio.
Understand PIPEDA and Accessibility Stance: Ask whether they discuss Canadian privacy obligations before work begins. Ask whether accessibility is built into their process or treated as a post launch audit. These answers help separate agencies experienced in Canadian markets from those with only occasional exposure.
Ask About Bilingual Capability: If your product may need to serve French speaking Canadians or support government and federal clients, bilingual UX capability is essential. Many agencies will say yes without fully understanding what that involves.
Check Industry Experience: Focus less on whether they have worked in your industry and more on whether they understand your users’ real context. For example, a team experienced in Alberta oil and gas operations may understand offline first workflows, rugged devices, and regulatory documentation needs.
Get Specifics on Post Launch Support: Ask what happens if users are not adopting a feature after launch. Strong agencies should have a plan for reviewing analytics, conducting follow up research, and iterating based on results rather than ending the engagement at handoff.
Run a Paid Pilot: A four to six week paid discovery sprint reveals more than any proposal. It shows communication style, design quality, process discipline, and whether the team listens during feedback sessions. Agencies that resist pilots are often the ones that need them most.
Consider Local or Canadian Based Agencies: For Calgary and Alberta businesses, local or Canadian based agencies offer real advantages in time zone alignment, regulatory familiarity, and easier accountability. Lower offshore rates can quickly lose their advantage once revision cycles, communication delays, and misunderstandings are factored in.
Read Also: Best Web App Design & Examples for Digital Product
Red Flags: What Bad Agencies Actually Look Like
Before signing with any agency, most buyers focus on pricing, portfolios, and promises while missing the warning signs that matter most. The costly mistakes usually become obvious only after the contract is signed. Here are the red flags experienced buyers wish they had spotted much earlier.
No Case Studies With Outcomes: If every portfolio piece only says the project looked great with no business context, the agency either does not track results or the results were weak. Neither is a good sign. Strong agencies should show measurable impact, not only polished visuals.
Discovery Is Optional: Any agency willing to skip straight to high fidelity design may be prioritizing quick billing over real outcomes. Discovery is where projects succeed or fail. If they rush through it or price it unrealistically low, problems usually begin there.
Vague Handoff Process: Saying they use Figma is not a handoff process. Ask what developers receive, how states are documented, and how questions are handled during the build phase. If the answers are vague, the handoff will be too.
No Accessibility in Workflow: If you mention AODA or WCAG and they seem surprised, they likely have limited experience serving Canadian clients seriously. Accessibility added at the end costs more and performs worse than accessibility built into the process from day one.
Beautiful Portfolios, No Canadian Context: An agency that has never considered PIPEDA consent flows, bilingual layouts, or provincial requirements is not operating in your market. They are working from their own market assumptions while taking on your project.
They Never Challenge Clients: Agencies that only say yes to every client request are order takers, not strategic partners. Ask for an example of when they disagreed with a client direction and how they handled it. The response can be very revealing.
Loose Contract Scope: If the contract says something broad like UX design for the platform without clear deliverables, revision rounds, or acceptance criteria, disputes become likely. Good agencies define scope clearly because they understand the cost of ambiguity.
What Good Work Looks Like: A Stage-by-Stage Delivery Guide
If you haven’t bought design services before, or if your last experience was chaotic, here’s what a well-run engagement actually produces at each stage.
Discovery and Strategy (Weeks 1 to 3): You receive a validated product roadmap, a user research synthesis, a competitive audit, defined personas, and a prioritized feature set. Ambiguity about what you’re building and who it’s for should be near zero by the end of this phase.
UX and Wireframing (Weeks 3 to 6): You receive low to mid-fidelity wireframes covering all primary user flows, an interaction map, and a usability test report if research has been run on the wireframes. At this point, every major UX decision should be visible and reviewable before visual design time gets committed.
Visual Design and UI (Weeks 5 to 10): You receive high-fidelity screens for all primary flows, a design system with components, a color and typography system, and defined states (default, hover, active, error, loading, empty). Brand alignment should be visible throughout.
Prototyping and Validation (Weeks 8 to 12): You receive clickable prototypes ready for user testing, a usability test plan, and a results summary. Changes based on real user behavior happen here, not after launch.
Dev Handoff and Build Support (Ongoing): You receive dev-ready Figma files with all edge cases documented, design tokens, a component library, and an agency contact who’s available to answer developer questions during the build. Expect to use this resource. Good engineers ask a lot of clarifying questions.
Post-Launch (30 to 90 Days): You receive a review of real user behavior against design intent, a prioritized list of iteration opportunities, and updated screens or flows based on what’s not working. The goal isn’t perfection at launch. It’s continuous improvement based on real signals.
What It Costs: Digital Product Design Agency Fees in Canada (2026)
Most digital product design projects in Canada run between $40,000 and $250,000+ CAD, depending on scope, engagement model, and the maturity of what you’re building. That’s a wide range, and it’s wide because a focused MVP design sprint is a fundamentally different project from a full enterprise product design system.
| Location | Typical Cost Range (CAD) | Notes |
| Toronto, ON | $80,000 to $300,000+ | Highest agency rates in Canada; large enterprise client base |
| Vancouver, BC | $70,000 to $250,000+ | Strong design talent pool; premium market pricing |
| Calgary, AB | $40,000 to $180,000 | Competitive rates, senior capability, lower overhead than major metros |
| Ottawa, ON | $50,000 to $180,000 | Strong government and public sector design ecosystem |
| Montreal, QC | $35,000 to $150,000 | Cost-effective; genuine bilingual UX capability |
| Offshore (Europe/Asia) | $15,000 to $80,000 | Lower hourly rates but real risks: handoff friction, time zone gaps, regulatory blind spots, and revision cycles that close the cost gap fast |
The table above reflects project-based work. Monthly retainers typically run $8,000 to $25,000 CAD, depending on scope and team size. Embedded squad arrangements tend to run higher.
What drives your number up or down:
Product complexity: A two-role app with three primary flows is a fundamentally different scope than a multi-tenant SaaS platform with a dashboard, an admin system, and integrations. Define your scope before asking for proposals.
Whether discovery is included: Some agencies quote design without discovery, which produces cheaper-looking proposals and more expensive projects. A real discovery phase typically adds $10,000 to $30,000 CAD to a proposal but saves that multiple times over in rework avoided.
Design system maturity required. If your product needs to scale across multiple surfaces (mobile, web, admin, partner portal), a proper design system is a significant investment. If you’re building a single-surface MVP, a lightweight component library is sufficient.
Accessibility requirements. Designing for WCAG 2.1 AA or higher compliance from the start adds time to design and review cycles. It’s always cheaper to build in than to retrofit.
Bilingual scope. If your product requires both English and French, add 20 to 30% to your design timeline for layout adjustments, content reflow, and QA.
Location of your partner. Calgary-based agencies offer experienced senior design talent at rates that are meaningfully more competitive than Toronto or Vancouver equivalents, without the communication friction and regulatory blind spots that offshore teams consistently introduce.
Post-launch support. If it’s not defined in the contract, it won’t happen. Budget for a post-launch iteration period explicitly, typically 4 to 8 weeks at a defined monthly rate.
Canadian Industries That Benefit Most From Digital Product Design
Every industry benefits from good product design. But some Canadian industries are at an inflection point where design quality is the difference between a product that gets adopted and one that sits unused.
Oil and Gas Technology: Oil and gas technology is especially relevant in Calgary. The sector is overdue for modern software, and companies building field operations tools, safety management systems, ESG reporting platforms, and supply chain visibility apps need design partners who understand offline first requirements, industrial UX patterns, and regulatory documentation needs.
Healthcare and Telehealth Platforms: Healthcare and telehealth products need PHIPA and PIPEDA compliance built into design from the beginning. This includes consent flow architecture and how patient data appears in clinical workflows. Getting this wrong is not only a UX issue, it is a compliance risk with real consequences.
Real Estate Technology: Real estate technology is a sector where mobile first design and strong data visualization directly influence conversion. Whether it is a buyer facing search platform or an agent productivity tool, design standards have risen sharply in recent years, and outdated products are losing deals.
Agri Tech Platforms: Agri tech platforms serving Canadian producers face unique design constraints such as offline or low connectivity environments, users who may not be digital natives, and data that must be understood quickly in the cab of a tractor. These challenges require real field research, not studio assumptions.
Indigenous Owned Digital Services: Digital services built for or by Indigenous businesses and communities require cultural competency that goes beyond standard UX patterns. Design partners with thoughtful experience and appropriate community involvement bring a different and valuable perspective.
Government and Public Sector Services: Government and public sector digital services must meet WCAG 2.2 standards, French language obligations, and PIPEDA requirements by default. They also serve users with varying levels of digital literacy, making accessibility and plain language design essential.
Financial Services and Fintech: Financial services and fintech in Canada operate under OSFI guidance and provincial securities regulations. Design that communicates trust, security, and compliance clearly is performing real risk management work, not only visual design.
Conclusion
Choosing a digital product design agency isn’t a portfolio decision. It’s a process decision, a communication decision, and for Canadian businesses, a regulatory decision. The agencies that produce the best outcomes are the ones with documented processes, honest case studies, and clear accountability from discovery through post-launch.
The Canadian market has specific requirements that most global agencies miss: PIPEDA-aware consent design, AODA accessibility compliance, bilingual UX for national reach, and industry-specific knowledge in sectors like healthcare, oil and gas, real estate, and government. Those requirements don’t disappear just because your agency is based somewhere else.
At Calgary App Developer, we build and design digital products for Canadian businesses, from early-stage discovery through full-stack development, with compliance requirements, Canadian market context, and real post-launch accountability built in. If you’re evaluating design partners and want a conversation with a team that knows your market, start here.
FAQ’s
1. What’s the difference between a digital product design agency and a UI/UX agency?
A UI/UX agency focuses primarily on the interface and user flow. A digital product design agency takes a wider view, covering business strategy, user research, technical feasibility, design systems, development handoff, and post-launch iteration. The distinction matters because a UI/UX agency hands off screens; a product design agency stays accountable for outcomes. For most Canadian founders building a serious digital product, you want the latter, even if you end up hiring the former for budget reasons.
2. How much does a digital product design agency cost in Canada?
Most projects in Canada run $40,000 to $250,000+ CAD, depending on scope, engagement model, and the complexity of what you’re building. A focused discovery sprint typically costs $10,000 to $25,000 CAD. A full MVP design engagement runs $50,000 to $150,000 CAD in most Canadian markets. Calgary-based agencies tend to offer competitive rates relative to Toronto or Vancouver while maintaining senior talent quality. Offshore quotes often look cheaper but rarely account for revision cycles, regulatory gaps, and the communication overhead that shows up in every complex project.
3. How long does a typical digital product design project take?
A well-run MVP design engagement typically takes 8 to 16 weeks from discovery through dev-ready handoff. Discovery alone is usually 2 to 4 weeks. Visual design and UI for a moderately complex product run another 4 to 8 weeks. Enterprise transformation projects or platforms with multiple user types and complex integrations can run 4 to 12 months. Build extra time into your plan if you need bilingual design, accessibility compliance, or deep research phases.
4. Should I start with a discovery phase or go straight to design?
Start with discovery always. Discovery is where you validate that you’re solving the right problem for the right users, before committing significant engineering time to building the wrong thing. Founders who skip discovery to save time and money almost always end up paying more to rework assumptions that a 3-week discovery phase would have caught. The agencies that let you skip it aren’t doing you a favor.
5. Do I need a Canadian agency, or can I work with an offshore team?
You can work with offshore teams, but you’re taking on specific risks that aren’t always obvious upfront. Regulatory awareness is the big one: PIPEDA, AODA, PHIPA, bilingual obligations, and industry-specific requirements (OSFI for fintech, PHIPA for healthcare) are things most offshore agencies simply don’t know exist. Time zone gaps compound on complex projects where quick design questions need quick answers. And revision cycles that stem from miscommunication can quietly close the cost gap between offshore and local rates. For simple, clearly scoped projects, offshore can work. For anything with Canadian compliance requirements or significant complexity, a local or Canadian partner carries far less risk.
6. What deliverables should I expect from a digital product design agency?
At minimum: a user research report, validated user flows, wireframes, high-fidelity UI screens, a design system with component library, interactive prototypes, dev-ready Figma files with documented edge cases and states, and a design handoff package. The best agencies also provide a product strategy document, an accessibility audit, and a post-launch iteration plan. If a proposal doesn’t specify exactly what you’ll receive, ask for it in writing before signing anything.
7. How does PIPEDA affect digital product design for Canadian businesses?
PIPEDA governs how Canadian businesses collect, use, and disclose personal information. For product design, this shows up in consent flow architecture (how you ask for permission to collect data), privacy settings UI (how users access and control their data), data collection notices (what you disclose at the point of collection), and breach notification flows. A design agency that doesn’t know what PIPEDA requires can inadvertently design non-compliant flows that create legal exposure. It’s a question worth asking directly during evaluation.
8. How do I know if an agency is actually good at accessibility?
Ask them specifically what standards they design to (WCAG 2.1 AA, WCAG 2.2, AODA). Ask whether they use automated accessibility testing tools during the design phase and which ones. Ask to see an accessibility annotation from a past project. And ask whether they’ve ever had a client come back with accessibility issues post-launch and how they handled it. The answers to those questions separate agencies that treat accessibility as a real discipline from those that treat it as a checkbox they’ll tick at the end.






